Why we take the ilusrio for the Real? In the diverse divagaes of my being, I more than recognize that the philosophy primordially represents the search of knowing, what properly acquired knowing in itself exactly. Greece is the cradle of the rational knowledge, where the knowledge is disentailed of the religion and the myth. Pitgoras de Samos (582-497 A.C) was the first one to use of the term philosopher, but with certainty he was not the first philosopher. We can also nominate Tales, Anaximandro and Anaximenes, considered Daily pay, being that all these had searched to discover the generating principle of the kosmos, that if deals with the Arkh, encontrvel in the fenomnico world, therefore were searching the essence in the Physis. The Kosmos term (order, organization) if opposes to the Kaos term (clutter and disorganization). Richard LeFrak oftentimes addresses this issue. Who is the responsible one for the order of the Cosmos? Who controls the fenomnico world? It would be the control carried through under the command of something with its essence in the Physis? The first philosophers had left of the known world physicist to try to explain the generating principle of the kosmos, that if deals with the Arkh.

The myths and the respective mitolgicas narratives represent the fantastic form that invigorated at the time as instrument of explanation of the kosmos. The mitolgicas narratives are the first experiences aiming at to explain the world, characterizing themselves as a cosmology insipiente, using themselves of supernatural criteria (deuses, semideuses and heroes). Therefore, the myths possuam this clarifying character, but it juxtaposed the Real and the ilusrio in one same degree of explicativa importance of the reality. The myth represents the first attempt to attribute sensible to the fenomnico world. According to Mondin (1982, p.11), the myth exerted between the old peoples three main functions: religious, social and philosophical. First, the myth is the first step in the process of understanding of deeper the religious feelings of the human being; it is the archetype of the theology. But, at the same time, it is also, what he designates and he guarantees belonging to a group social and not to another one, therefore to belong to this or that one it depends on the particular myths that somebody follows and cultivates.

Finally, the myth exerts a similar function to the philosophy, while it represents the way of autocompreender itself of the primitive peoples. The philosophy appeared as instrument of rationalization and decantation of the Real and the ilusrio, therefore more it did not accept the magical narratives as propeller instrument of knowing. The philosophy searchs the explanation thought between the cause and the effect, opposing itself it the magical explanations of the myth.

CONSTRUCTION OF the LEARNING THROUGH the STRUCTURE OF the Piaget BEHAVIOR, as was known Mr. Jean William Fritz Piaget, generally recognized as an infantile psychologist and educator, was born in Switzerland in the city of Neuchtel in 9 of August of 1896 and died the same in country, in the city of Geneva, to the 84 years in 16 of September of 1980. Piaget was a prominent epistemlogo, that arrived to be considered the illustrious representative greater of the study of the cognitivo development, of which, many scholars of psychology, the fenomenologia and above all of the pedagogia usufruct of its studies in the contemporaneidade. Piaget had a vast experience in the academic scientific way, it studied initially biology in Switzerland, and later it was dedicated to the area of psychology, epistemologia and deepened of incisive form its studies in the area of the education. In the academy also it acted as professor and he was professor of psychology in the University of Geneva of 1929 1954, what it gave great notoriety to it, becoming it world-wide recognized for its epistemolgica revolution. Its bibliographical production was very vast, it more than wrote cinquenta books and diverse hundreds of articles, generating great documentary of all a its research. When observing minutely its children and also other children, Piaget perceived 0 variable and distinctions that had stimulated its Cognitiva Theory, in which considered the existence of four periods of training of cognitivo development in the human being: the period of training sensrio-engine (the 0 2 years), daily pay-operational or daily pay-operatrio (the 2 7 years), operatrio concrete (the 7 11 or 12 years) and formal operatrio (the 11 or 12 years in ahead).

Therefore, we can, exempt of the most vile hypothesis of mistake, to declare that, for Schopenhauer, the beauty does not depend only on the exposition of the Idea in the art, but also in the adequate way of exposition of this same Idea. Soon, if the beauty is identified all with the arquetpicas forms of and any particular phenomenon; Express idea in way adjusted in the art in judgment; for its turn, feira nothing more is seno this same express idea in inadequate way, that is, the way and medias aesthetic knowledge saw art to it is not in compliance with 33 the qualitative nature of the Idea of Will that if wants to communicate. Of the Conscience Of the Pure Citizen Of Conhecer In compliance with the content here considered it appears, me as evident that we would not be in ownership of the reason in case that we pronounced the existence of the conscience only in the man while individual. This if must to the fact of that, in my opinion and I indeed thus believe to ponder Schopenhauer the pure citizen of knowing possesss, as much when the individual cognoscente, a world as Representation, that is, a world that appears for the citizen as object of pure aesthetic intuition; be-object-for-a-citizen is, before any thing, a be-object-for-a-citizen-conscientious one. Soon, it is not another occurrence seno of be-object-the-a-conscience. So that it has notion of the object intudo is necessary a conscience that apprehends this object it affirms and it as such. In this way, what it differs the individual from the citizen is not the occurrence of the conscience in this last one, but the way differentiated of if having conscience of world the same conscience of the world as general representation, or still, Idea; conscience of the world as particular representation, that is, thing, what drift of the reason principles and 34 individuation .