The data demonstrate to a small prominence for the social activities and the civil construction, all with absolute predominance for the masculine man power. information are in accordance with the productive structure and the partner-economic level of the population of the city. According to IBGE 1991 has a bigger empregabilidade in relation to the masculine sex that the feminine one in the city, however, these data are compatible when analyzed table 05 when it is mentioned to the number biggest of men who women. The city of Brook of the Plaza possesss IDH 0, 568 medium (PNUD/2000), the GIP of R$ a thousand (47,736 IBGE/20056) and per capita GIP R$ 2,577, 00 (IBGE/2005). With this index of human development of the Country, the city occupies the position of n 5,135 in ranking of the 5,507 Brazilian cities, according to census of the IBGE of 2000.
Showing that action urges series and systematics of combat to the poverty, the illiteracy and low the quality of life in the city. According to 2000 census, only 31.5% of the domiciles possuam water supply and 53% did not have sanitary exhaustion, this reality still lasts in our city. It had a considerable increase of the garbage collection, due to awareness in relation to the environment from the creation of the Secretariat of Environment in 2005, and still with the installation of sanitary aterros, what it provoked the reduction of the garbage burnt and played in other destinations. In agriculture the main activities are: agro-industrial fruticultura, cultures, alimentary and olercolas cultures. In the fruticultura it is cultivated of maracuj, lemon, banana and pineapple. With prominence for the plantations of maracuj and banana. In the group of the olercolas the tomatoe culture is distinguished little, being produced in the Region, still has in this group the culture of batatinha, of chuchu, chili cabbage and cucumber, an activity carried through in small country properties and developed by small producers using hand of familiar workmanship, however this type of farming already is cultivated by producing medium and presents a dynamics differentiated mainly in what if it by hand relates of workmanship and insumos.
Knowledge. The knowledge is unquestionably a fact. In any society it is a constant. The history of the knowledge is a permanent process of rectification and overcoming of concepts, explanations, theories, techniques and ways to think, to act and to make. The characteristics of the knowledge, its roots and its process of elaboration and improvement are studied under well different perspectives, for the diverse thinkers who if have busy of this subject. For the idealist, the knowledge is born and depletes in the citizen, as pure idea. Criticizing radicalism of the idealistic positions, LEFERBVRE observes that ' ' many Metaphysical ration in the following way: ' ' The citizen of the knowledge, the human being, is a conscientious individual, one I; who is one I? It is a conscientious of itself e, therefore, closed being in itself exactly, In it, cannot have seno subjective states, states of conscience. How it could leave itself exactly, to carry itself to it are of itself in order to know a diverse thing of itself? The object, in case that exists, it is it are of the reach.
The pretense knowledge of objects, proper the existences of these, is not more than an illusion (…). The knowledge is defined as apprehension of an object for the citizen, that is, the cognoscitivo citizen, the conscience, has as function apprehension of the object. This apprehension is become fullfilled by means of a process where the citizen leaves its sphere to catch the properties of the object, being that these properties appear as image in the citizen. It is important to emphasize that a citizen alone is subject for an object and an object alone is object for a citizen, therefore these remain separate. The knowledge object tends to identify itself with real object, without never atingiz it, however, in its fullness. The objetividade is an infinite process of approach, as occurs in the assinttico parallelism of LOBATSCHEWSKY (1793-1856).
Per moments, it will not be easy to tolerate the anxiety of the change, but to be kind to it, it allows to recognize it, and thus, to modify it. Little by little it will yield the anxiety, the chaotic thing of the emotions. He is for that reason better to realise it along with specialists who can contain these anxieties and fear. 3. – To accept the differences, the pair does not have to think like you, to speak like you, to think like you, to do the love like you, and amarte as you say that she must love. The pair is an individual person with its own ways and behaviors, which attracted to you initially. To change to the expectations and the forms of property in relation to feminine sex and the family.
4. – To learn to satisfy the own needs. That is to say, to stop hoping that the pair makes the things by us. To assume the rolls that each unon has I decide to play, and to support, not to do violence to. 5. – To train in other forms and you rule of relation. To improve the communication, first with one same one, to know our feelings, our thoughts, our actions and needs, and later those of my pair, as well as those of the relation and those of the family.
To give to each of them the specific weight him of its importance. The family and the pair are a society in which all require of well-taken care of and respect. 6. – To construct Igualitarias Relations: as much the pair as I comprised important of the bond and for it she is needed that we are equals in everything. The women require of a valuation than they do, although per moment, their world is only domestic. It is an equipment and all require of conditions of equality to work.
The language form is determined by the sender who in turn transmits to the receiver its message. ORIGIN OF the LANGUAGE As appeared, which its true origin? According to Eugen Rosenstock? Huessey in its book ' ' The origin of linguagem' ' , it appeared through the imitation, of the gestures. For me ' ' origem' ' of the language any is so legitimate question how much another question of ' ' origem' '. This wants to say that it possesss that limitation that is central to any of these questions: she is necessary to know what we want to say for ' ' origem' ' what we want to say for ' ' o-rigem' ' of the language. (ROSENSTOCK-HUESSEY, 2002, P. 37).
When it is said in origin of the language we have a double one felt: the language as capacity of the man if to communicate, because it is about an essential property to its species and another one through the manifestations carried through for signals, is gestuais, fisionmicos or constructed they. The significant fogueiras, the telegraph of Morse, the current traffic lights to govern the transit in the cities biggest, the double communication of the deaf person-dumb are examples, through gestures that they mean letters or of the symbolic gestures for them created and that they allow to a colloquy almost so fast how much ours. Ribot, in ' ' Evolution DES ides gnrale' ' it says: ' ' To perfect for the effort of all the thus invented language and thanks to the tradition, that transmits the results successful; but at the same time, it modifies itself, as everything that lives; when the races and social groups of the humanity if had divided and diversified, also it was cindiu in different languages. Here it is verified that the language if holds as a social fact. (RIBOT, P.