Therefore, we can, exempt of the most vile hypothesis of mistake, to declare that, for Schopenhauer, the beauty does not depend only on the exposition of the Idea in the art, but also in the adequate way of exposition of this same Idea. Soon, if the beauty is identified all with the arquetpicas forms of and any particular phenomenon; Express idea in way adjusted in the art in judgment; for its turn, feira nothing more is seno this same express idea in inadequate way, that is, the way and medias aesthetic knowledge saw art to it is not in compliance with 33 the qualitative nature of the Idea of Will that if wants to communicate. Of the Conscience Of the Pure Citizen Of Conhecer In compliance with the content here considered it appears, me as evident that we would not be in ownership of the reason in case that we pronounced the existence of the conscience only in the man while individual. This if must to the fact of that, in my opinion and I indeed thus believe to ponder Schopenhauer the pure citizen of knowing possesss, as much when the individual cognoscente, a world as Representation, that is, a world that appears for the citizen as object of pure aesthetic intuition; be-object-for-a-citizen is, before any thing, a be-object-for-a-citizen-conscientious one. Soon, it is not another occurrence seno of be-object-the-a-conscience. So that it has notion of the object intudo is necessary a conscience that apprehends this object it affirms and it as such. In this way, what it differs the individual from the citizen is not the occurrence of the conscience in this last one, but the way differentiated of if having conscience of world the same conscience of the world as general representation, or still, Idea; conscience of the world as particular representation, that is, thing, what drift of the reason principles and 34 individuation .