" The amount of this just ridiculous when you consider that the rental value "6iznes" meter is at least $ 55. According to available data the company owns area of more than 30 square meters, of which the company has a month (again on the minimum) 1.65 million, with the skunk – 237 600 dollars Company earnings (conservative). It is easy to calculate that even 13 percent (and in this case, and all 25%) of the Income Tax this amount 30.888 million in, e. For even more details, read what Robert Speyer says on the issue. That's how long the metropolitan treasury received less over 15 years of a foreign agency. So that 53 thousand hryvnia "are granted to taxes and penalties" for which so warmly thanked Tax Inspectorate vigilant residents not otherwise mockery nal naive Ukrainians will not name, the author of these lines had a chance to talk with representatives of the company DTZ (not being a legal person passes the name of "GOOYOORD BV" all real estate). Their stance, as citizens of Ukraine, I would not dare to call patriotic. Fully protecting the interests of their overseas employers, they tried to convince me that the activities of their companies are very beneficial effect on the appearance of the capital, saying that completely revolutionized the purchased home, which previously represented a "bug-infested and krysyatniki" and expelled to the edge they need to be thankful for what is now live in a modern and spacious apartments. Complaints about the destroyed lawns, playgrounds for parking and other fire ladders with elevator additions in DTZ regard not only as "inevitable struggles of old and obsolete with the new and progressive." "The new and progressive – it is necessary to understand the company and its excess profits.
And the "old and obsolete" – simple Kiev (Citizens of Ukraine), which is so "lucky" to live in the capital of European state … So it turns out: someone "democracy" and who is a mother. Does such activities of such foreign firms to national interests of Ukraine and its citizens? Of course not! And if so, whether it is time to stop the relevant authorities, with the strongest possible terms, like strangers on our outrage, his native land? RS. When the material was gotovkpechati, we learned that a certain company Ucaptal Partners (UP) in conjunction with private investors from Western Europe have completed the acquisition of a portfolio of office buildings Prime Kiev Portfolio, owned gollandskoykompanii GOOIOORD V. V. In the UP crossed the leading specialists of the company DTZ,-the report says, but in fact such a public relations company, is nothing more than to distract from the tax in excess profits of the company GOOIOORD V.V.", which is currently working as safely and continues to work to become super profits. Victoria YASNOPOLSKAYA 23-29 October 2008, "Pravda Ukrainy"
Since the time of the decision of the foreclosure of the mortgaged property not perform the imperative-discretionary regulations established by Part 2 of Art. 40 of the Law of Ukraine "On Mortgage" and Part 3. 109 LCD Ukraine on eviction of tenants by the court of the house or apartment premises for which treatment is carried out as the mortgaged property, such claims at this stage can not be satisfied, because currently there are no violations or non-recognition of the rights and challenging Freedoms mortgagee or the new owner regarding the release of these premises to residents in understanding the requirements of Art. 3 Code of Civil Procedure of Ukraine concerning the individual's right to appeal to the courts for protection. Price subject mortgage is set in the contract. If in a case of this assessment agree that the court had no reason it does not take into account, since it is a condition of contract. If the parties arises dispute regarding the assessment, depending on which side its challenges, it must on the contents of Part 3. 10 CPC of Ukraine to bring another of its size, in particular the application for the appointment and conduct appropriate forensics.
Encumbrance of movable property is registered in the State Register in the manner prescribed by this Law (Article 11). The plaintiff, who goes to court to pay penalty for security burden, shall, before the filing of appropriate action in the court to notify in writing all burdensome, for whom established registered encumbrance of the same movable property to start judicial proceedings in the case of foreclosure on the security burdens (v. 25). However, to challenge credit agreements or agreements of guarantee the other spouse, courts should consider following. The provisions of Art.
65 UK Ukraine on the order of disposition of property, which is the object of joint ownership of spouses, regulate the relations regarding the disposition of property, namely, located in the common property of spouses, and do not relate to the rights of one spouse to obtain a loan because the loan agreement is a transaction to obtain the ownership of money and does not create responsibilities to the other spouse, but only to the borrower, as part of the contract (part 1 of article. 1054 Civil Code of Ukraine). Concerning a contract of guarantee, according to Article 553 CC of Ukraine, assigned to the guarantor to the creditor of the debtor for with his or her duties. The guarantor is responsible to the creditor for breach of an obligation by the debtor. Thus, the guarantee is a way to ensure the fulfillment of an obligation (usually money) and not deal on disposal of property, due to the surety, guarantee agreement does not create a duty for all persons other than parties to the contract, and therefore data for legal norms of Art. 65 UK Ukraine does not apply. It is not a disposal of the property of the spouses and the contract of pledge (mortgage). Information provided by the lawyer and the lawyer